The short answer: run Google Ads first if you’re selling something people already actively search for, and run Facebook Ads first if you’re introducing an offer people don’t yet know they want. Most mature businesses eventually run both, but if budget forces a choice, the decision comes down to whether you’re capturing existing demand or creating new demand.
This is one of the most common questions we get from new clients at Salterra, and the honest answer is “it depends on your business,” but it depends on specific, answerable things — not a coin flip. Here’s the actual framework.
Google Ads is an intent-capture channel. Someone types “emergency plumber near me” or “best CRM for small business” because they already have a need and are actively looking for a solution. Your ad shows up in the moment of demand. Facebook Ads is an interruption-based, discovery channel. Someone scrolling their feed isn’t looking for your product — your ad has to create the desire, or surface a need they weren’t actively thinking about at that moment.
This distinction drives almost every downstream difference between the two platforms: cost structure, creative requirements, sales cycle expectations, and what “success” looks like in the first thirty days.
Google Ads tends to be the better starting point when:
Google Ads generally converts at a higher rate because it’s meeting existing intent, but that also means it can’t create demand that doesn’t already exist. If nobody is searching for what you sell, Google Ads has little to capture.
Facebook Ads tends to be the better starting point when:
Facebook Ads shine at building the full funnel — awareness through consideration through conversion — inside one platform, especially when paired with retargeting sequences that catch people who needed a second or third touch before buying.
Google Ads pricing is driven heavily by keyword competitiveness — some industries face very expensive clicks because many advertisers are bidding for the same high-intent searches. Facebook Ads pricing is driven more by audience size, creative quality, and relevance score in the auction, which means a smaller or newer business can sometimes compete more affordably than it could on a crowded Google keyword.
Neither platform is inherently “cheaper” — cost has to be evaluated against conversion rate and the value of the customer acquired, not the sticker price of a click.
Short sales cycles with a clear, immediate need (emergency repairs, time-sensitive purchases) tend to favor Google Ads, since intent and urgency are already present at the moment of the search. Longer, consideration-heavy sales cycles — where a prospect needs multiple touches, trust-building, and education before converting — tend to favor Facebook Ads, because its retargeting infrastructure is built for exactly that kind of nurture sequence.
Most businesses that scale past initial traction end up running both, but sequenced deliberately rather than launched simultaneously without a plan:
In our experience, the businesses that get the most value from “running both” are the ones who resist launching both on day one with a thin budget split two ways. Prove out one channel first, get tracking and offer-market fit solid, then add the second channel once you have the budget to give both a fair test.
Splitting a very small monthly budget across two platforms often means neither one gets enough volume to exit its learning period or generate a statistically meaningful read. As a practical rule, it’s usually better to fully fund one channel until it’s profitable and well understood, then expand into the second, rather than spreading a limited budget thin across both from the start.
Local, urgent-need service businesses (plumbing, locksmiths, urgent legal services) almost always see Google Ads outperform first, since the searcher already has an active need. Visually driven consumer products, apparel, beauty, and lifestyle brands almost always see Facebook Ads outperform first, since discovery and desire-creation matter more than capturing an existing search. B2B software and services often sit in between — Google Ads for bottom-funnel, high-intent searches, Facebook and LinkedIn Ads for awareness and retargeting a longer consideration cycle.
Neither is universally cheaper — cost depends on your industry's keyword competitiveness on Google and your audience size and creative quality on Facebook. Compare cost per acquisition and lifetime value, not just cost per click.
You can, but with a limited budget it's usually better to fully fund and prove out one channel first, since splitting a small budget two ways often means neither platform gets enough volume to optimize properly.
Usually, for services with clear "near me" or emergency search demand. But local businesses with a strong visual story or community presence can still get real value from Facebook Ads for brand-building and retargeting website visitors.
Yes, particularly for awareness and retargeting a longer B2B sales cycle, though it typically performs a different role than Google Ads, which tends to capture bottom-funnel, high-intent B2B searches more directly.
Use Google's Keyword Planner or a similar tool to check search volume for terms describing your product or service. If meaningful volume exists and it maps to real buying intent, Google Ads is worth testing early.
No. Google Ads creative should speak to someone who already knows what they want, while Facebook Ads creative needs to earn attention and build interest from a colder starting point — the messaging should reflect that difference.
Terry has 30+ years in software and SEO. He’s the founder of Salterra Digital Services and SEO Spring Training, host of the Roundtable SEO Mastermind, and lead instructor at SEO University — teaching the exact tactics his team uses on client work.
This guide is one lesson from the Facebook Ads with GoHighLevel course. Get every lesson, framework and checklist — plus the full 38-course catalog — inside SEO University.
Practitioner-focused training across the full digital marketing stack — from technical SEO to conversion optimization and the AI search era. By Salterra Digital Services, since 2011.